Legal Electronic Recycling Rules
Is it better to recycle the old and the broken or the new and the broken? Well, in terms of recycling, the old is broken and the new ones are broken. But in terms of protecting the environment, both kinds of waste are equally dangerous to the environment. So, what's the difference between electronic recycling compliance?
How can something be illegal but still be helpful to the environment? This is a question that should be asked in light of the recent push for electronic recycling. What is electronic recycling and how can it be both beneficial and legal?
There is a way to recycle, and this way is the right product that doesn't need to be incinerated. This is called electronic recycling. This has two components, the first is the Recycling Standards Council.
Public company that has been in business for many years
The RSC was established to help those who are recycling or interested in recycling. It is both a non-profit and federally funded organization. The second component is the ERCB, Electronic Recycling Corporation.
The E-COMBINERS offer their services to the public, they do not sell their services. They have been in business for over 20 years and were one of the founding members of the E-COMBINERS.
The main reason for the ECOMBINERS founding is that electronic waste is by far the largest item of electronic waste found in landfills. It is estimated that up to 90% of electronic waste found in landfills is electronic waste that has been recycled. However, the majority of electronic waste found in landfills can not be recycled due to the fact that it contains asbestos, lead, cadmium, and mercury.
Because the ECOMBINERS had no experience in the field of electronic recycling when they formed, they could not legally be in charge of the E-COMBINERS. It was passed on to the ERCB. Also, the heavy metals that are present in electronic waste do not fall under the jurisdiction of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
These heavy metals were passed on to the EPA but the EPA had no ability to oversee them. So the ECOMBINERS did it for them. They began the process of looking for a government agency that could regulate these harmful materials so they could all work together for the betterment of the environment.
In order to meet this end, the members of the E-COMBINERS met with representatives from government agencies and organizations and formed the Compact for Mercury and Lead Abatement. This compact stated that each agency that was responsible for monitoring mercury and lead would conduct monthly, quarterly, and annual inspections of those waste streams.
The other set of waste streams that were under the authority of the EPA were asbestos, lead, cadmium, and mercury. The compact states that the EPA would only conduct random sampling, never looking at a stream or site more than once.
After the compact was created, the ECOMBINERS began the process of holding meetings with manufacturers of electronic products and large electronic institutions. They came to the conclusion that these companies needed to be more environmentally friendly. Because of this, they lobbied for the development of the batteries market to have increased recycled content.
Since the compact for mercury and lead abatement, electronic waste has become more compliant. The legal authorities for these materials have made it clear that they will follow the guidelines set forth by the Compact for Mercury and Lead Abatement.